LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Cost line at draft finding

Information Technology · IT Financial Management · line IT11B · Unit Cost Read. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
IT11B-1004
Subject
Naomi Petrov
Requested by
Nadia Whitfield
Value
$1.7m
Materiality
high
Currently held by
Sourcing Model Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, IT Financial Management
Orchestrator
IT Finance Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Cost Attribution AgentgbsCleared

Cleared model cost per service

2026-08-17 21:02:00ZAuthority IT11-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 1ce4debc...53b343out 649309ef...265ef7artifact ART-IT11B-1000-1 genesis 13a3ab4f...938f0b
2
Showback AgenttaskCleared

Cleared benchmark

2026-08-18 01:01:00ZAuthority IT11-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in f525d3ac...8e2a98out 10a07963...fc7757artifact ART-IT11B-1000-2 13a3ab4f...938f0b 0e9add91...4b1303
3
Budget Tracking AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at draft finding

2026-08-18 05:01:00ZAuthority IT11-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 951f13f8...31924bout 23c7d2fb...753fdbartifact ART-IT11B-1000-3 0e9add91...4b1303 63ef7b76...a8f7b5

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

IT11-AUTH-A1ActiveIT Finance Orchestrator

Any unit on a it financial management line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FRDelegated from Director, IT Financial ManagementExpires 2027-04-30

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

CIO review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the cost line decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, IT Financial Management · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

TECH-3Y3 years
Technology change and access evidence
Security review and change audit requirement.
Deleted at three years from the change closing.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.