LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Cost line at allocate to business

Information Technology · IT Financial Management · line IT11A · Monthly Showback. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
1
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
IT11A-1026
Subject
Owen Nakamura
Requested by
Lukas Haddad
Value
$616k
Materiality
high
Currently held by
IT spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
Director, IT Financial Management
Orchestrator
IT Finance Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Cost Attribution AgentgbsCleared

Cleared attribute cost

2026-08-17 18:07:00ZAuthority IT11-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 5fbe53b5...67dda5out bcb6cd27...628e98artifact ART-IT11A-1003-1 genesis d0e62d13...bfaa84
2
IT Finance OrchestratororchestratorRefused

Attempted clearance above the delegated cap

2026-08-18 01:30:00ZAuthority IT11-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
orchestrator-brief@p14
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12, notify-and-route@t5
in 9c28ee74...ef0054out c55c0274...492db1artifact ART-IT11A-2-refusal d0e62d13...bfaa84 525ea86e...385c6c
3
Cost Attribution AgentgbsIn progress

Holding at allocate to business

2026-08-18 01:33:00ZAuthority IT11-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in abff12bf...13fb95out 7b202a2c...8a41f5artifact ART-IT11A-1003-3 525ea86e...385c6c 26da0d6d...7b1e1d

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

IT11-AUTH-A1ActiveIT Finance Orchestrator

Any unit on a it financial management line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FRDelegated from Director, IT Financial ManagementExpires 2027-04-30

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
promptorchestrator-briefp14currentChief of Staff office
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetnotify-and-routet5currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Owner review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the cost line decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, IT Financial Management · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

TECH-3Y3 years
Technology change and access evidence
Security review and change audit requirement.
Deleted at three years from the change closing.
AI-10Y10 years
Autonomous decision evidence
Model risk and AI regulation expectations on traceability of automated decisions, taken at the longest emerging requirement rather than the current minimum.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted where the decision affected a person and an appeal window may still open.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.