LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Change record at declare

Information Technology · Change & Release · line IT10C · Emergency Change. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 1 record were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
1
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
0
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
IT10C-1052
Subject
Callum Muller
Requested by
Anika Brennan
Value
$8k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
Director, Change Management (human)
Sub-function owner
Director, Change Management
Orchestrator
Change Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Director, Change Managementgate-approverHeld

Holding at declare

2026-08-18 02:45:00ZAuthority IT10-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A0Retention TECH-3Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
none
in a4d4afd1...c04a5aout a5f1e900...1a36a3artifact ART-IT10C-1007-1 genesis 21e85846...3aea5b

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

IT10-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, Change Management

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $25,000,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from Information Technology leadershipExpires 2027-06-10

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Declare
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the change record decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Change Management · open on this chain
Retrospective approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the change record decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Change Management · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

TECH-3Y3 years
Technology change and access evidence
Security review and change audit requirement.
Deleted at three years from the change closing.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.