LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Exit case at deprovision

Human Resources · Exit Management · line HR9B · Involuntary Exit.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 6 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
6
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
3
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
1
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR9B-1007
Subject
Daniel Sorensen
Requested by
Owen Ito
Value
$22k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
Exit Interview Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Employee Relations
Orchestrator
Exit Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Director, Employee Relationsaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared leader decision

2026-08-18 06:37:00ZAuthority HR9-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in 9c176a66...31b4dbout 13409f6f...c23511artifact ART-HR9B-1001-1 genesis → 408317e6...a25e07
2
Final Pay Calculation AgenttaskCleared

Cleared settlement model

2026-08-18 07:06:00ZAuthority HR9-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 1077b14b...beb025out 4dfc2f69...e0817eartifact ART-HR9B-1001-2 408317e6...a25e07 → f1ae24cd...973406
3
Director, Employee Relationsaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared approve settlement

2026-08-18 07:34:00ZAuthority HR9-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in f82fcee7...021311out 10ebf434...9ded0cartifact ART-HR9B-1001-3 f1ae24cd...973406 → 5a7d4ab9...93dea3
4
Resignation Intake AgentgbsCleared

Cleared execute

2026-08-18 08:03:00ZAuthority HR9-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 8d24d0f0...9c0f42out eaf55de7...336058artifact ART-HR9B-1001-4 5a7d4ab9...93dea3 → 28d561e2...c50af8
5
Exit OrchestratororchestratorIn progress

Holding at deprovision

2026-08-18 08:31:00ZAuthority HR9-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
orchestrator-brief@p14
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12, notify-and-route@t5
in 04eb0a0d...67d9a7out a550321a...fef886artifact ART-HR9B-1001-5 28d561e2...c50af8 → 9558beda...b58e2d
6
Director, Employee Relationsaccountable-ownerCorrectioncorrects #2

Correction posted against record 2

An input was read from a stale reference and the earlier record states the wrong figure. The earlier record stands unaltered; this record carries the corrected figure and the reason.

2026-08-18 08:33:00ZAuthority HR9-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in 0170f696...a24b83out 56c39907...0fd6afartifact ART-HR9B-1001-correction 9558beda...b58e2d → 80e39898...0f80d8

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR9-AUTH-A1ActiveExit Orchestrator

Any unit on a exit management line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Director, Employee RelationsExpires 2027-01-27
HR9-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, Employee Relations

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Human Resources leadershipExpires 2027-04-24

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
promptorchestrator-briefp14currentChief of Staff office
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetnotify-and-routet5currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Legal clearance
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the exit case decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Employee Relations · not reached
Leader decision
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the exit case decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Employee Relations · not reached
Approve settlement
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the exit case decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Employee Relations · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.