LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Exit case at knowledge capture

Human Resources · Exit Management · line HR9A · Voluntary Exit.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR9A-1038
Subject
Hannah Haddad
Requested by
Callum Kaplan
Value
$82k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Deprovisioning Coordination Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Employee Relations
Orchestrator
Exit Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Resignation Intake AgentgbsCleared

Cleared notice

2026-08-18 08:19:00ZAuthority HR9-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 2a7cc730...c13be3out e7e84375...672c2eartifact ART-HR9A-1005-1 genesis → d9945eae...bbb768
2
Exit Interview AgenttaskCleared

Cleared manager confirm

2026-08-18 08:33:00ZAuthority HR9-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in e588d922...806bd7out 59c8677c...efedd4artifact ART-HR9A-1005-2 d9945eae...bbb768 → a7305bda...5e8fe2
3
Knowledge Capture AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at knowledge capture

2026-08-18 08:46:00ZAuthority HR9-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in c86df862...4f0613out 43ee521f...9c09efartifact ART-HR9A-1005-3 a7305bda...5e8fe2 → 5e0a70bc...9e40df

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR9-AUTH-A1ActiveExit Orchestrator

Any unit on a exit management line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Director, Employee RelationsExpires 2027-01-27

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

This line runs without a formal gate.

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.