LensReading which lens this session carries.
Evidence spineLive view of this unit

Auditor evidence pack

Comp action at set budget

Human Resources · Total Rewards · line HR8A · Annual Merit Cycle.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 1 record were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
1
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
0
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR8A-1052
Subject
Ines Adeyemi
Requested by
Idris Kowalski
Value
$27k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
Market Benchmark Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
VP Total Rewards
Orchestrator
Total Rewards Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
VP Total Rewardsgate-approverIn progress

Holding at set budget

2026-08-17 19:16:00ZAuthority HR8-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in b1e2df0a...e0ea9dout 8682327e...399bc9artifact ART-HR8A-1007-1 genesis → 471bbeed...c411dd

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR8-AUTH-H1ActiveVP Total Rewards

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from Human Resources leadershipExpires 2027-05-25

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Set budget
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the comp action decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Total Rewards · open on this chain
Exception review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the comp action decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Total Rewards · not reached
Budget approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the comp action decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Total Rewards · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.