LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Comp action at set budget

Human Resources · Total Rewards · line HR8A · Annual Merit Cycle. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 1 record were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
1
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
0
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR8A-1024
Subject
Kofi Raman
Requested by
Sanjay Achebe
Value
$45k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Comp Band Modeling Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
VP Total Rewards
Orchestrator
Total Rewards Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
VP Total Rewardsgate-approverIn progress

Holding at set budget

2026-08-17 20:00:00ZAuthority HR8-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in 9b3ab41f...d3f455out 62f62d73...c692b5artifact ART-HR8A-1003-1 genesis 5de83af7...6feef2

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR8-AUTH-H1ActiveVP Total Rewards

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from Human Resources leadershipExpires 2027-05-25

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Set budget
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the comp action decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Total Rewards · open on this chain
Exception review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the comp action decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Total Rewards · not reached
Budget approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the comp action decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Total Rewards · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship. Personal identifiers pseudonymized at two years where the record is retained only for statistical monitoring.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome. Every people-decision record is held, including the records that show the decision was taken by a human, because those are the records that answer the claim.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.