LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Assignment at immigration case

Human Resources · Talent Mobility · line HR7B · International Assignment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
2
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR7B-1023
Subject
Marcus Mensah
Requested by
Hiro Brennan
Value
$19k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
Repatriation Planning Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Global Mobility
Orchestrator
Mobility Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Internal Opportunity Match AgentgbsCleared

Cleared nominate

2026-08-18 08:09:00ZAuthority HR7-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 63631dd0...189200out 55b9f3df...c00d17artifact ART-HR7B-1003-1 genesis → 7f2b22b4...016602
2
Director, Global Mobilityaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared tax & pe screen

2026-08-18 08:26:00ZAuthority HR7-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in f7c1ba40...a43cf7out 1a0f9562...4d74a3artifact ART-HR7B-1003-2 7f2b22b4...016602 → 14d6f34e...e68beb
3
Assignment Structuring AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at immigration case

2026-08-18 08:43:00ZAuthority HR7-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in a3744213...fe0c59out b2604bb6...1e3b0bartifact ART-HR7B-1003-3 14d6f34e...e68beb → 3d52a857...15a0ed

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR7-AUTH-A1ActiveMobility Orchestrator

Any unit on a talent mobility line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DEDelegated from Director, Global MobilityExpires 2027-03-25
HR7-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, Global Mobility

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DEDelegated from Human Resources leadershipExpires 2027-01-19

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Tax & PE screen
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the assignment decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Global Mobility · not reached
Approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the assignment decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Global Mobility · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.