LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Learning path at frame

Human Resources · Learning & Development · line HR6D · Capability Investment Position. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 1 record were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
1
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
1
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR6D-1003
Subject
Marcus Voss
Requested by
Daniel Costa
Value
$33m
Materiality
critical
Currently held by
Content Generation Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Learning & Capability
Orchestrator
L&D Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Skills Gap AgentgbsIn progress

Holding at frame

2026-08-17 09:17:00ZAuthority HR6-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A3Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 301d8ade...322dc3out c3421354...6bf7b2artifact ART-HR6D-1000-1 genesis 134151ae...1c27d4

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR6-AUTH-A1ActiveL&D Orchestrator

Any unit on a learning & development line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FR · BRDelegated from Director, Learning & CapabilityExpires 2027-05-19

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Ratify
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the learning path decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Learning & Capability · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship. Personal identifiers pseudonymized at two years where the record is retained only for statistical monitoring.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome. Every people-decision record is held, including the records that show the decision was taken by a human, because those are the records that answer the claim.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.