LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Learning path at sme review

Human Resources · Learning & Development · line HR6C · Content Build.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
2
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR6C-1021
Subject
Bruno Muller
Requested by
Leila Okafor
Value
$15k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
L&D Orchestrator (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Learning & Capability
Orchestrator
L&D Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Skills Gap AgentgbsCleared

Cleared brief

2026-08-18 08:11:00ZAuthority HR6-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in ed3826e5...c3d62dout 8fd836c3...e56a1fartifact ART-HR6C-1003-1 genesis → ac0f79ed...73b92a
2
Curriculum Curation AgenttaskCleared

Cleared draft content

2026-08-18 08:27:00ZAuthority HR6-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 08ab99e6...3f4c8fout 8358879c...fbbff0artifact ART-HR6C-1003-2 ac0f79ed...73b92a → 4cf7476c...1847e7
3
Director, Learning & Capabilitygate-approverIn progress

Holding at sme review

2026-08-18 08:44:00ZAuthority HR6-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in 45a5fc9e...0823daout 1b2eb381...45a368artifact ART-HR6C-1003-3 4cf7476c...1847e7 → ff9cd9f8...6f7c87

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR6-AUTH-A1ActiveL&D Orchestrator

Any unit on a learning & development line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FR · BRDelegated from Director, Learning & CapabilityExpires 2027-05-19
HR6-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, Learning & Capability

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FR · BRDelegated from Human Resources leadershipExpires 2026-09-22

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

SME review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the learning path decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Learning & Capability · cleared on this chain
Publish
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the learning path decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Learning & Capability · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.