LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Review at outcome

Human Resources · Performance Management · line HR5C · PIP Lifecycle. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
2
Taken by software
Human actions
3
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR5C-1012
Subject
Daniel Voss
Requested by
Rafael Okafor
Value
$52k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Rating Distribution Monitor (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Performance & Talent
Orchestrator
Performance Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Director, Performance & Talentgate-approverCleared

Cleared legal check

2026-08-18 07:06:00ZAuthority HR5-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in e81bb750...ddf717out dba8d6b4...d34f45artifact ART-HR5C-1001-1 genesis 8f6f5a1f...25b5ca
2
Director, Performance & Talentgate-approverCleared

Cleared manager decision

2026-08-18 07:29:00ZAuthority HR5-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in 74d85984...c2468eout 0d80fd63...8bf41aartifact ART-HR5C-1001-2 8f6f5a1f...25b5ca 439f0a06...8eb4ab
3
PIP Drafting AgenttaskCleared

Cleared plan draft

2026-08-18 07:52:00ZAuthority HR5-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A1Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in dd228518...64858bout d4d1c497...28618dartifact ART-HR5C-1001-3 439f0a06...8eb4ab 8ae06864...b0dbd2
4
Rating Distribution MonitorpolicyCleared

Cleared monitor

2026-08-18 08:14:00ZAuthority HR5-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A1Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
gate-approval@p8
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in f9102e67...48eb30out dc65f35a...176b9cartifact ART-HR5C-1001-4 8ae06864...b0dbd2 20acc611...a52fe7
5
Director, Performance & Talentgate-approverIn progress

Holding at outcome

2026-08-18 08:37:00ZAuthority HR5-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in 52d7f7c1...afb0e1out 0c9eaea3...bb9699artifact ART-HR5C-1001-5 20acc611...a52fe7 46e6216a...b940e4

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR5-AUTH-A1ActivePerformance Orchestrator

Any unit on a performance management line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Director, Performance & TalentExpires 2027-04-22
HR5-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, Performance & Talent

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Human Resources leadershipExpires 2027-06-27

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
promptgate-approvalp8currentGovernance office
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Legal check
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the review decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Performance & Talent · not reached
Manager decision
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the review decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Performance & Talent · not reached
Outcome
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the review decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Performance & Talent · cleared on this chain

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship. Personal identifiers pseudonymized at two years where the record is retained only for statistical monitoring.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome. Every people-decision record is held, including the records that show the decision was taken by a human, because those are the records that answer the claim.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.