LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Review at bias scan

Human Resources · Performance Management · line HR5B · Year-end & Calibration.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR5B-1025
Subject
Leila Marchetti
Requested by
Hannah Mensah
Value
$68k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Director, Performance & Talent (human)
Sub-function owner
Director, Performance & Talent
Orchestrator
Performance Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Goal Cascade AgentgbsCleared

Cleared assemble evidence

2026-08-18 05:14:00ZAuthority HR5-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A1Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in adf11158...80c359out d847489c...21c60cartifact ART-HR5B-1003-1 genesis → 6983c841...81019b
2
Continuous Feedback AgenttaskCleared

Cleared draft reviews

2026-08-18 06:29:00ZAuthority HR5-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A1Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 832a3f16...ff6ce6out 4c3972a6...c2fe5dartifact ART-HR5B-1003-2 6983c841...81019b → a5bd42de...8d758e
3
Calibration Prep AgenttaskHeld

Holding at bias scan

2026-08-18 07:45:00ZAuthority HR5-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A1Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in d772eb09...b156beout cc119fbc...1a5079artifact ART-HR5B-1003-3 a5bd42de...8d758e → 75f969c7...facbd2

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR5-AUTH-A1ActivePerformance Orchestrator

Any unit on a performance management line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Director, Performance & TalentExpires 2027-04-22

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Calibration session
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the review decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Performance & Talent · not reached
Rating lock
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the review decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Performance & Talent · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.