LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Review at track

Human Resources · Performance Management · line HR5A · Goal Cycle. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR5A-1005
Subject
Beatriz Farouk
Requested by
Ines Sorensen
Value
$2k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
Review Quality Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Performance & Talent
Orchestrator
Performance Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Goal Cascade AgentgbsCleared

Cleared cascade

2026-08-18 08:46:00ZAuthority HR5-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A1Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 081e4538...9dd0e4out efd6aa21...2b4720artifact ART-HR5A-1000-1 genesis b43c48a6...56837b
2
Continuous Feedback AgenttaskCleared

Cleared draft goals

2026-08-18 08:49:00ZAuthority HR5-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A1Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 454805c5...aac4b5out ffac1213...8935cdartifact ART-HR5A-1000-2 b43c48a6...56837b c4dd6770...f6e991
3
Director, Performance & Talentaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared manager review

2026-08-18 08:52:00ZAuthority HR5-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in 050e4f36...834740out 47f5dfc8...bd7f4fartifact ART-HR5A-1000-3 c4dd6770...f6e991 e096cf73...572565
4
Review Quality AgentobserveCleared

Cleared lock

2026-08-18 08:54:00ZAuthority HR5-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A1Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in ff6edeaf...0b502eout 817c4985...dd488eartifact ART-HR5A-1000-4 e096cf73...572565 7e9d0717...cf66cc
5
PIP Drafting AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at track

2026-08-18 08:57:00ZAuthority HR5-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A1Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 39ad31a5...f433caout 8681013e...afa5daartifact ART-HR5A-1000-5 7e9d0717...cf66cc 93fba10f...0a8bf4

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR5-AUTH-A1ActivePerformance Orchestrator

Any unit on a performance management line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Director, Performance & TalentExpires 2027-04-22
HR5-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, Performance & Talent

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Human Resources leadershipExpires 2027-06-27

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
modelobserve-signal3.1currentSensing guild
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptobserve-scanp11currentSensing guild
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Manager review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the review decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Performance & Talent · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship. Personal identifiers pseudonymized at two years where the record is retained only for statistical monitoring.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome. Every people-decision record is held, including the records that show the decision was taken by a human, because those are the records that answer the claim.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.