LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Onboarding case at cohort day-1

Human Resources · Onboarding · line HR3C · Bulk Cohort Onboarding. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 4 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
4
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR3C-1006
Subject
Tomas Achebe
Requested by
Grace Lindqvist
Value
$8k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
Onboarding Orchestrator (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Employee Experience
Orchestrator
Onboarding Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Pre-boarding Comms AgentgbsCleared

Cleared cohort form

2026-08-18 06:16:00ZAuthority HR3-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A4Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 151e9df5...1639ceout de886cf1...2becc0artifact ART-HR3C-1000-1 genesis 17f38c7c...2c8a74
2
Pre-boarding Comms AgentgbsCleared

Cleared batch compliance

2026-08-18 06:57:00ZAuthority HR3-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A4Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in a8e3bd37...a1d401out 4992dcc5...024f22artifact ART-HR3C-1000-2 17f38c7c...2c8a74 4f0aa9f4...3b98da
3
Provisioning Coordination AgenttaskCleared

Cleared batch provision

2026-08-18 07:38:00ZAuthority HR3-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A4Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 7ab61b68...7753e4out 4eca634d...19b8b6artifact ART-HR3C-1000-3 4f0aa9f4...3b98da 7157ef2a...ebfc18
4
Buddy & Manager Prep AgentgbsIn progress

Holding at cohort day-1

2026-08-18 08:19:00ZAuthority HR3-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A4Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 56e5e0f7...e0421dout 314ebf56...b6ff78artifact ART-HR3C-1000-4 7157ef2a...ebfc18 4bdf21e2...b3ea29

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR3-AUTH-A1ActiveOnboarding Orchestrator

Any unit on a onboarding line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Director, Employee ExperienceExpires 2027-06-01

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

This line runs without a formal gate.

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship. Personal identifiers pseudonymized at two years where the record is retained only for statistical monitoring.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome. Every people-decision record is held, including the records that show the decision was taken by a human, because those are the records that answer the claim.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.