LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Onboarding case at fast-track pack

Human Resources · Onboarding · line HR3B · Rehire & Boomerang.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR3B-1033
Subject
Nadia Tanaka
Requested by
Rafael Voss
Value
$12k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
Day-1 Readiness Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Employee Experience
Orchestrator
Onboarding Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Pre-boarding Comms AgentgbsCleared

Cleared match alumni

2026-08-18 07:22:00ZAuthority HR3-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 334cf26d...eebd3cout 3268d3ec...fb65c1artifact ART-HR3B-1004-1 genesis → 56f38b78...377fde
2
Pre-boarding Comms AgentgbsCleared

Cleared verify record

2026-08-18 07:55:00ZAuthority HR3-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in d5f132ca...62c166out 92205e34...6c74a5artifact ART-HR3B-1004-2 56f38b78...377fde → d128837e...544958
3
Provisioning Coordination AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at fast-track pack

2026-08-18 08:27:00ZAuthority HR3-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in b5011850...ce57e5out c1ac8fe2...a5ccf5artifact ART-HR3B-1004-3 d128837e...544958 → 8f219e95...6831de

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR3-AUTH-A1ActiveOnboarding Orchestrator

Any unit on a onboarding line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Director, Employee ExperienceExpires 2027-06-01

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

This line runs without a formal gate.

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.