LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Requisition at track

Human Resources · Talent Acquisition · line HR2C · Agency & Vendor Management.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR2C-1001
Subject
Clara Tanaka
Requested by
Owen Baptiste
Value
$85k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Background & Right-to-Work Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
VP Talent Acquisition
Orchestrator
Talent Acquisition Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Intake & Req Definition AgentgbsCleared

Cleared brief

2026-08-18 08:19:00ZAuthority HR2-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in d30881cc...8780bfout 3c6914d3...afed64artifact ART-HR2C-1000-1 genesis → 145b189d...515877
2
Sourcing AgenttaskCleared

Cleared route

2026-08-18 08:33:00ZAuthority HR2-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in f9a553f5...6f5e45out c20a0074...89ece1artifact ART-HR2C-1000-2 145b189d...515877 → 6a9affc0...62b06e
3
Screening AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at track

2026-08-18 08:46:00ZAuthority HR2-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 26ff20e2...5a60d1out ff3252b3...b84f36artifact ART-HR2C-1000-3 6a9affc0...62b06e → 739dc94a...281de4

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR2-AUTH-A1ActiveTalent Acquisition Orchestrator

Any unit on a talent acquisition line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from VP Talent AcquisitionExpires 2027-04-05

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

This line runs without a formal gate.

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.