LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Requisition at engage

Human Resources · Talent Acquisition · line HR2B · Talent Pool Nurture.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR2B-1027
Subject
Mei Kowalski
Requested by
Aaron Baptiste
Value
$19k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
Scheduling Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
VP Talent Acquisition
Orchestrator
Talent Acquisition Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Intake & Req Definition AgentgbsCleared

Cleared identify

2026-08-18 08:04:00ZAuthority HR2-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A3Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in fa4d4a1f...bd5182out 0fb55192...d009d6artifact ART-HR2B-1003-1 genesis → 5373f07c...7d337a
2
Sourcing AgenttaskCleared

Cleared segment

2026-08-18 08:23:00ZAuthority HR2-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A3Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 264004cb...5c5f9aout df52b30f...0236e8artifact ART-HR2B-1003-2 5373f07c...7d337a → f649a8c6...b44477
3
Screening AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at engage

2026-08-18 08:41:00ZAuthority HR2-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A3Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 044523ad...724dafout 8ac173d8...21274eartifact ART-HR2B-1003-3 f649a8c6...b44477 → 668cb634...576332

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR2-AUTH-A1ActiveTalent Acquisition Orchestrator

Any unit on a talent acquisition line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from VP Talent AcquisitionExpires 2027-04-05

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

This line runs without a formal gate.

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.