LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Requisition at handoff

Human Resources · Talent Acquisition · line HR2A · Req-to-Offer. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR2A-1002
Subject
Tomas Petrov
Requested by
Rosa Rhodes
Value
$38k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
H2R spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
VP Talent Acquisition
Orchestrator
Talent Acquisition Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Candidate Comms AgentgbsCleared

Cleared assess

2026-08-18 05:01:00ZAuthority HR2-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 019c1231...b03421out 8bb1e289...c09872artifact ART-HR2A-1000-1 genesis d053a3c6...3eed3b
2
Background & Right-to-Work AgenttaskCleared

Cleared offer model

2026-08-18 05:49:00ZAuthority HR2-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 1e518594...d3ca9eout 0229d6b1...b0117cartifact ART-HR2A-1000-2 d053a3c6...3eed3b 61a8810a...7f4828
3
VP Talent Acquisitionaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared offer approve

2026-08-18 06:37:00ZAuthority HR2-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in 6643da5f...70eb7bout 098c4731...d0cfcbartifact ART-HR2A-1000-3 61a8810a...7f4828 b85658d0...6f2e98
4
Hiring Doctrine AgentstrategyCleared

Cleared accept

2026-08-18 07:24:00ZAuthority HR2-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
challenger-review@p6
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in d90e8fb0...e7da6eout d9947f68...9bf463artifact ART-HR2A-1000-4 b85658d0...6f2e98 b2f45465...fa162c
5
Intake & Req Definition AgentgbsIn progress

Holding at handoff

2026-08-18 08:12:00ZAuthority HR2-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 5ffff341...c9770cout 92f93da2...3daaf1artifact ART-HR2A-1000-5 b2f45465...fa162c a019f250...27b9b0

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR2-AUTH-A1ActiveTalent Acquisition Orchestrator

Any unit on a talent acquisition line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from VP Talent AcquisitionExpires 2027-04-05
HR2-AUTH-H1ActiveVP Talent Acquisition

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Human Resources leadershipExpires 2027-02-16

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptchallenger-reviewp6currentStrategy office
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Approve req
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the requisition decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Talent Acquisition · not reached
Offer approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the requisition decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Talent Acquisition · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship. Personal identifiers pseudonymized at two years where the record is retained only for statistical monitoring.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome. Every people-decision record is held, including the records that show the decision was taken by a human, because those are the records that answer the claim.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.