LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Plan scenario at draft position

Human Resources · Strategic Workforce Planning · line HR1C · Build-Buy-Borrow Position.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 4 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
4
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR1C-1006
Subject
Rosa Duarte
Requested by
Hiro Ito
Value
$16.4m
Materiality
critical
Currently held by
Location Strategy Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
VP Workforce Strategy
Orchestrator
Workforce Planning Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Demand Forecast AgenttaskCleared

Cleared frame question

2026-08-18 00:27:00ZAuthority HR1-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in eee8548d...914a57out 123d96ed...83e36fartifact ART-HR1C-1000-1 genesis → 96bad8a9...0fdccd
2
Supply & Attrition Model AgenttaskCleared

Cleared gather evidence

2026-08-18 02:35:00ZAuthority HR1-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 1664903b...369da0out 05b09f11...63b1a6artifact ART-HR1C-1000-2 96bad8a9...0fdccd → 1bab2932...fd993b
3
Skills Taxonomy AgenttaskCleared

Cleared model options

2026-08-18 04:43:00ZAuthority HR1-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 227d15d1...37ad9fout 8ef9da82...87e8f2artifact ART-HR1C-1000-3 1bab2932...fd993b → c8831298...dbd7ad
4
Build-Buy-Borrow AgentstrategyIn progress

Holding at draft position

2026-08-18 06:52:00ZAuthority HR1-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
challenger-review@p6
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 75fd4e26...1b3044out d46531be...f4602dartifact ART-HR1C-1000-4 c8831298...dbd7ad → b09f6c1f...8e27f6

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR1-AUTH-A1ActiveWorkforce Planning Orchestrator

Any unit on a strategic workforce planning line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from VP Workforce StrategyExpires 2027-02-02

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptchallenger-reviewp6currentStrategy office
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Ratify
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the plan scenario decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Workforce Strategy · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.