Auditor evidence pack
Plan scenario at map skills gap
Human Resources · Strategic Workforce Planning · line HR1A · Annual Plan Build. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.
Chain verified
Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 4 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.
hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})
Records
4
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
1
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002
The unit
What the work was, and where it sits
Reference
HR1A-1026
Subject
Ines Delgado
Requested by
Bruno Ferreira
Value
$2.2m
Materiality
high
Currently held by
Planning Policy Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
VP Workforce Strategy
Orchestrator
Workforce Planning Orchestrator
Every action, in order
Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it
1
Demand Forecast AgenttaskCleared
Cleared frame demand
2026-08-17 04:23:00ZAuthority HR1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in ac7a9d2e...3fa3e9out 66f37c4f...c227ecartifact ART-HR1A-1003-1 genesis → 6204178f...0e5ff0
2
Supply & Attrition Model AgenttaskCleared
Cleared model supply
2026-08-17 13:55:00ZAuthority HR1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in d881a9ae...aed0b3out 5a98dd70...90cb44artifact ART-HR1A-1003-2 6204178f...0e5ff0 → 0016708c...3fa04a
3
Workforce Planning OrchestratororchestratorRefused
Attempted clearance above the delegated cap
2026-08-17 23:25:00ZAuthority HR1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention AI-10YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
Prompt
orchestrator-brief@p14
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12, notify-and-route@t5
in efa8be9d...06ec60out 33e1fde4...aa3f26artifact ART-HR1A-3-refusal 0016708c...3fa04a → 41876691...197beb
4
Skills Taxonomy AgenttaskIn progress
Holding at map skills gap
2026-08-17 23:28:00ZAuthority HR1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in da2f633d...1e632eout e534a44a...d27b51artifact ART-HR1A-1003-4 41876691...197beb → eba470af...2a9620
Authority relied on
Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions
Any unit on a strategic workforce planning line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.
Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from VP Workforce StrategyExpires 2027-02-02
Versions in force
Exactly what was running when these actions were taken
| Kind | Identifier | Version | Status | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| model | reasoner-core | 5.4 | current | Platform model council |
| model | extract-lite | 2.9 | current | Platform model council |
| policy | people-decisions | v3 | current | Chief people officer |
| prompt | orchestrator-brief | p14 | current | Chief of Staff office |
| prompt | task-execution | p21 | current | Shared service engineering |
| toolset | read-only-lookup | t12 | current | Platform engineering |
| toolset | notify-and-route | t5 | current | Platform engineering |
| toolset | document-fetch | t9 | current | Shared service engineering |
Gates on this line
The control points this unit had to clear
Ratify
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the plan scenario decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Workforce Strategy · not reached
Records schedule and holds
How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen
AI-10Y10 years
Autonomous decision evidence
Model risk and AI regulation expectations on traceability of automated decisions, taken at the longest emerging requirement rather than the current minimum.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted where the decision affected a person and an appeal window may still open.
HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship. Personal identifiers pseudonymized at two years where the record is retained only for statistical monitoring.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome. Every people-decision record is held, including the records that show the decision was taken by a human, because those are the records that answer the claim.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel
What this pack proves, and what it does not
Read this before you rely on it
It does prove
- Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
- Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
- Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
- Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
- The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
- It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
- The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
- Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.