LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Plan scenario at ratify

Human Resources · Strategic Workforce Planning · line HR1A · Annual Plan Build. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR1A-1004
Subject
Pierre Achebe
Requested by
Ines Haddad
Value
$56k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Workforce Planning Orchestrator (agent)
Sub-function owner
VP Workforce Strategy
Orchestrator
Workforce Planning Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Build-Buy-Borrow AgentstrategyCleared

Cleared cost scenarios

2026-08-14 20:12:00ZAuthority HR1-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
challenger-review@p6
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in a0cd0f36...411959out fb9a49a7...e39a62artifact ART-HR1A-1000-1 genesis 1fff0cc3...143bfd
2
Headcount Scenario AgenttaskCleared

Cleared location view

2026-08-15 13:10:00ZAuthority HR1-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 981fdc68...7827beout eb1419e5...4a80e7artifact ART-HR1A-1000-2 1fff0cc3...143bfd e68c0abf...d5eaeb
3
Location Strategy AgentstrategyCleared

Cleared draft plan

2026-08-16 06:07:00ZAuthority HR1-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
challenger-review@p6
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 7c467d52...ed3523out 1f96bdd9...5fa3baartifact ART-HR1A-1000-3 e68c0abf...d5eaeb 4c851b21...36c672
4
Workforce Strategy AgentstrategyCleared

Cleared challenge

2026-08-16 23:05:00ZAuthority HR1-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
challenger-review@p6
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in c652ce48...e19354out b9831a6d...5b87deartifact ART-HR1A-1000-4 4c851b21...36c672 0ea46f1f...c13d64
5
VP Workforce Strategygate-approverIn progress

Holding at ratify

2026-08-17 16:02:00ZAuthority HR1-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in 69539654...33c367out 5f52b2a2...ea0659artifact ART-HR1A-1000-5 0ea46f1f...c13d64 328f05dc...4b2061

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR1-AUTH-A1ActiveWorkforce Planning Orchestrator

Any unit on a strategic workforce planning line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from VP Workforce StrategyExpires 2027-02-02
HR1-AUTH-H1ActiveVP Workforce Strategy

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from Human Resources leadershipExpires 2026-12-30

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptchallenger-reviewp6currentStrategy office
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Ratify
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the plan scenario decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Workforce Strategy · cleared on this chain

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship. Personal identifiers pseudonymized at two years where the record is retained only for statistical monitoring.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome. Every people-decision record is held, including the records that show the decision was taken by a human, because those are the records that answer the claim.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.