LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Change at verify

Human Resources · HR AI-IT · line HR11B · System Change Release. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR11B-1034
Subject
Clara Kowalski
Requested by
Hiro Delgado
Value
$83k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Vendor & License Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, HR Technology
Orchestrator
HR Tech Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Agent Performance MonitorpolicyCleared

Cleared build

2026-08-18 05:54:00ZAuthority HR11-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
gate-approval@p8
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 822359fe...1cc0b1out c30a58ea...78acc2artifact ART-HR11B-1004-1 genesis 028a93f8...42f172
2
Access & SoD AgentpolicyCleared

Cleared test

2026-08-18 06:31:00ZAuthority HR11-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
gate-approval@p8
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in be79fc57...6d86b0out 446dc708...31b67dartifact ART-HR11B-1004-2 028a93f8...42f172 688e0c76...de940c
3
Director, HR Technologyaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared cab approve

2026-08-18 07:08:00ZAuthority HR11-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in e7690e77...fdb70fout 1a1b896a...ba8a17artifact ART-HR11B-1004-3 688e0c76...de940c ca86d2da...70a133
4
Vendor & License AgenttaskCleared

Cleared deploy

2026-08-18 07:46:00ZAuthority HR11-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 335002e3...4b3c3bout 070265b4...270f5aartifact ART-HR11B-1004-4 ca86d2da...70a133 353139ac...1b71c0
5
HR Tech Strategy AgentstrategyIn progress

Holding at verify

2026-08-18 08:23:00ZAuthority HR11-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
challenger-review@p6
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 6745d225...4d413aout 6a521ae2...528f4dartifact ART-HR11B-1004-5 353139ac...1b71c0 9310b7ea...2bdf5d

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR11-AUTH-A1ActiveHR Tech Orchestrator

Any unit on a hr ai-it line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DEDelegated from Director, HR TechnologyExpires 2027-04-14
HR11-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, HR Technology

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DEDelegated from Human Resources leadershipExpires 2027-05-13

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
promptgate-approvalp8currentGovernance office
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptchallenger-reviewp6currentStrategy office
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

CAB approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the change decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, HR Technology · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship. Personal identifiers pseudonymized at two years where the record is retained only for statistical monitoring.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome. Every people-decision record is held, including the records that show the decision was taken by a human, because those are the records that answer the claim.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.