LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Change at steward review

Human Resources · HR AI-IT · line HR11A · Data Quality Remediation.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 4 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
4
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR11A-1039
Subject
Callum Nakamura
Requested by
Elena Ito
Value
$71k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Access & SoD Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, HR Technology
Orchestrator
HR Tech Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
HRIS Data Quality AgentobserveCleared

Cleared detect defect

2026-08-18 06:34:00ZAuthority HR11-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in e4a46601...76b596out 55150d8b...456639artifact ART-HR11A-1005-1 genesis → f36acf19...1a04ed
2
Integration Health MonitorobserveCleared

Cleared classify

2026-08-18 07:10:00ZAuthority HR11-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 78b1df95...2c99dfout 98c7520c...a1a683artifact ART-HR11A-1005-2 f36acf19...1a04ed → d7486aa9...7ca4f7
3
Integration Health MonitorobserveCleared

Cleared auto-fix

2026-08-18 07:47:00ZAuthority HR11-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 7c67ccac...a9079fout e03da9ed...89c2a5artifact ART-HR11A-1005-3 d7486aa9...7ca4f7 → 0912c687...9887d6
4
Director, HR Technologygate-approverIn progress

Holding at steward review

2026-08-18 08:23:00ZAuthority HR11-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A0Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
none
in b1ad43fc...4fd90eout 26b05518...976491artifact ART-HR11A-1005-4 0912c687...9887d6 → e6c96a8c...a88860

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR11-AUTH-A1ActiveHR Tech Orchestrator

Any unit on a hr ai-it line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DEDelegated from Director, HR TechnologyExpires 2027-04-14
HR11-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, HR Technology

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DEDelegated from Human Resources leadershipExpires 2027-05-13

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelobserve-signal3.1currentSensing guild
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
promptobserve-scanp11currentSensing guild
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Steward review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the change decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, HR Technology · cleared on this chain

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.