LensReading which lens this session carries.
Evidence spineLive view of this unit

Auditor evidence pack

Change at detect defect

Human Resources · HR AI-IT · line HR11A · Data Quality Remediation.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 1 record were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
1
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
1
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR11A-1026
Subject
Ines Ito
Requested by
Hannah Costa
Value
$57k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
HRIS Data Quality Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, HR Technology
Orchestrator
HR Tech Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
HRIS Data Quality AgentobserveIn progress

Holding at detect defect

2026-08-18 06:29:00ZAuthority HR11-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A3Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Model
[email protected]
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 90874746...cd6c46out 6547ccb4...300926artifact ART-HR11A-1003-1 genesis → 8d61d4cb...20abb6

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR11-AUTH-A1ActiveHR Tech Orchestrator

Any unit on a hr ai-it line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DEDelegated from Director, HR TechnologyExpires 2027-04-14

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelobserve-signal3.1currentSensing guild
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
promptobserve-scanp11currentSensing guild
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Steward review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the change decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, HR Technology · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.