LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Listening cycle at model options

Human Resources · Culture & Engagement · line HR10C · Culture Intervention. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-002

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
HR10C-1001
Subject
Rosa Sandoval
Requested by
Marcus Petrov
Value
$8.2m
Materiality
critical
Currently held by
Culture Strategy Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Culture & Engagement
Orchestrator
Culture Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Sentiment Sensing AgentobserveCleared

Cleared frame

2026-08-16 18:23:00ZAuthority HR10-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in af27da9e...188917out 590b4011...88ecf4artifact ART-HR10C-1000-1 genesis 367ce512...b07cfd
2
Survey Design & Run AgenttaskCleared

Cleared diagnose

2026-08-17 07:15:00ZAuthority HR10-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 03fa4df8...778aeaout 8cf85f90...d94424artifact ART-HR10C-1000-2 367ce512...b07cfd 7df869d8...014d1c
3
Theme Synthesis AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at model options

2026-08-17 20:08:00ZAuthority HR10-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A2Retention HR-6YLegal hold HOLD-002
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
people-decisions@v3
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 39da09b8...1b7e08out 648d7bea...566f82artifact ART-HR10C-1000-3 7df869d8...014d1c e7f03fc7...b03b35

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

HR10-AUTH-A1ActiveCulture Orchestrator

Any unit on a culture & engagement line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FR · BRDelegated from Director, Culture & EngagementExpires 2026-12-07

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
modelobserve-signal3.1currentSensing guild
policypeople-decisionsv3currentChief people officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptobserve-scanp11currentSensing guild
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Ratify
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the listening cycle decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Culture & Engagement · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

HR-6Y6 years
Employment and people decisions
Employment claim limitation periods, taken at the longest applicable across works-council jurisdictions.
Deleted at six years from the end of the employment relationship. Personal identifiers pseudonymized at two years where the record is retained only for statistical monitoring.
HOLD-002active
Employment claim — promotion decision
A claim has been filed alleging an automated screening step influenced a promotion outcome. Every people-decision record is held, including the records that show the decision was taken by a human, because those are the records that answer the claim.
Custodian Head of Employment Law · requested by Employment counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.