LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Automation at gather evidence

AI GBS & Global Business Services · Automation Factory · line GB7D · Automation Portfolio Position. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 2 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
2
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
2
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
GB7D-1005
Subject
Tomas Costa
Requested by
Kofi Novak
Value
$26.6m
Materiality
critical
Currently held by
Test Harness Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Head of Automation
Orchestrator
Automation Factory Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Opportunity Mining AgentobserveCleared

Cleared frame question

2026-08-16 08:05:00ZAuthority GB7-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in af623907...8c9c90out d7b61d61...e1847eartifact ART-GB7D-1000-1 genesis 58b68881...153beb
2
Feasibility Scoring AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at gather evidence

2026-08-17 08:32:00ZAuthority GB7-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 46343592...627643out fb381133...dad743artifact ART-GB7D-1000-2 58b68881...153beb 444c460a...0ca5bb

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

GB7-AUTH-A1ActiveAutomation Factory Orchestrator

Any unit on a automation factory line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DEDelegated from Head of AutomationExpires 2027-05-22

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
modelobserve-signal3.1currentSensing guild
policymateriality-bandsv9currentGroup controller
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptobserve-scanp11currentSensing guild
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Ratify
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the automation decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Head of Automation · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

AI-10Y10 years
Autonomous decision evidence
Model risk and AI regulation expectations on traceability of automated decisions, taken at the longest emerging requirement rather than the current minimum.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted where the decision affected a person and an appeal window may still open.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.