LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Service request at intake

AI GBS & Global Business Services · Service Catalog & Intake · line GB5A · Request to Tower. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 1 record were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
1
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
1
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
GB5A-1013
Subject
Zara Voss
Requested by
Oscar Brennan
Value
$76k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
AI-OPS spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
Head of Service Catalog
Orchestrator
Catalog & Intake Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Catalog & Intake OrchestratororchestratorIn progress

Holding at intake

2026-08-18 08:07:00ZAuthority GB5-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
orchestrator-brief@p14
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12, notify-and-route@t5
in 484b723a...9e17a9out ece86b22...fe1cbaartifact ART-GB5A-1001-1 genesis 3a689f19...cf23da

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

GB5-AUTH-A1ActiveCatalog & Intake Orchestrator

Any unit on a service catalog & intake line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Head of Service CatalogExpires 2027-01-15

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
policymateriality-bandsv9currentGroup controller
promptorchestrator-briefp14currentChief of Staff office
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetnotify-and-routet5currentPlatform engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

This line runs without a formal gate.

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

AI-10Y10 years
Autonomous decision evidence
Model risk and AI regulation expectations on traceability of automated decisions, taken at the longest emerging requirement rather than the current minimum.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted where the decision affected a person and an appeal window may still open.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.