LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Invoice at review

AI GBS & Global Business Services · S2P Control Tower · line GB2D · Payment Integrity Sweep. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 4 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
4
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
GB2D-1022
Subject
Pierre Nakamura
Requested by
Simon Kowalski
Value
$77k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Tower Lead, Source-to-Pay (human)
Sub-function owner
Tower Lead, Source-to-Pay
Orchestrator
Source-to-Pay Tower Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Requisition Validation AgentgbsCleared

Cleared scan runs

2026-08-17 21:23:00ZAuthority GB2-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in eca309a9...fb05d2out 0d18064d...abb4afartifact ART-GB2D-1003-1 genesis 9550659b...a7959a
2
Requisition Validation AgentgbsCleared

Cleared detect duplicates

2026-08-18 00:17:00ZAuthority GB2-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 9966ec4d...9f4b78out e764ef59...6c08b3artifact ART-GB2D-1003-2 9550659b...a7959a a4f2388d...40bd52
3
Requisition Validation AgentgbsCleared

Cleared hold

2026-08-18 03:11:00ZAuthority GB2-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in e559feed...24a3feout 4601b670...083fe6artifact ART-GB2D-1003-3 a4f2388d...40bd52 d5b01540...7ecaf1
4
Tower Lead, Source-to-Paygate-approverHeld

Holding at review

2026-08-18 06:06:00ZAuthority GB2-AUTH-H1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A0Retention AI-10Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
none
in 9a0a2093...bab095out 72bcf379...96ca74artifact ART-GB2D-1003-4 d5b01540...7ecaf1 6b26020f...91e66a

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

GB2-AUTH-A1ActiveSource-to-Pay Tower Orchestrator

Any unit on a s2p control tower line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FRDelegated from Tower Lead, Source-to-PayExpires 2027-05-06
GB2-AUTH-H1ActiveTower Lead, Source-to-Pay

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $25,000,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FRDelegated from AI GBS & Global Business Services leadershipExpires 2027-01-29

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policymateriality-bandsv9currentGroup controller
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the invoice decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Tower Lead, Source-to-Pay · cleared on this chain

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

AI-10Y10 years
Autonomous decision evidence
Model risk and AI regulation expectations on traceability of automated decisions, taken at the longest emerging requirement rather than the current minimum.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted where the decision affected a person and an appeal window may still open.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.