LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Payroll transaction at eligibility

AI GBS & Global Business Services · H2R Control Tower · line GB1D · Benefits Enrollment. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 2 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
2
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
2
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
GB1D-1002
Subject
Talia Costa
Requested by
Grace Marchetti
Value
$67k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
H2R spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
Tower Lead, Hire-to-Retire
Orchestrator
Hire-to-Retire Tower Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Employee Lifecycle AgentgbsCleared

Cleared open window

2026-08-18 07:20:00ZAuthority GB1-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A4Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 2413b172...aae507out 49c52ffd...ed09b3artifact ART-GB1D-1000-1 genesis 32ba265e...50a453
2
Employee Lifecycle AgentgbsIn progress

Holding at eligibility

2026-08-18 08:10:00ZAuthority GB1-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A4Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in c9a5d461...734871out ddc366ae...b0a984artifact ART-GB1D-1000-2 32ba265e...50a453 eaa72dfe...0517a4

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

GB1-AUTH-A1ActiveHire-to-Retire Tower Orchestrator

Any unit on a h2r control tower line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DEDelegated from Tower Lead, Hire-to-RetireExpires 2026-10-21

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policymateriality-bandsv9currentGroup controller
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

This line runs without a formal gate.

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

AI-10Y10 years
Autonomous decision evidence
Model risk and AI regulation expectations on traceability of automated decisions, taken at the longest emerging requirement rather than the current minimum.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted where the decision affected a person and an appeal window may still open.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.