LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Cost line at revise

AI GBS & Global Business Services · Cost-to-Serve Management · line GB11C · Automation Economics Position. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
5
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
GB11C-1007
Subject
Farrah Novak
Requested by
Aaron Tanaka
Value
$29.8m
Materiality
critical
Currently held by
Margin of Automation Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Head of Service Economics
Orchestrator
Cost-to-Serve Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Inference Cost AgenttaskCleared

Cleared gather evidence

2026-08-15 12:36:00ZAuthority GB11-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in e6a54512...8a86e5out db49fb6a...5f0f33artifact ART-GB11C-1001-1 genesis 796f4a70...0bc586
2
Volume Attribution AgenttaskCleared

Cleared model options

2026-08-16 02:17:00ZAuthority GB11-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 9201e516...823353out bd4c4b90...b39af1artifact ART-GB11C-1001-2 796f4a70...0bc586 6057314c...6b41c0
3
Chargeback AgentgbsCleared

Cleared draft position

2026-08-16 15:58:00ZAuthority GB11-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in bfd328f7...4f1d94out 0b7fe288...c1c60fartifact ART-GB11C-1001-3 6057314c...6b41c0 4477218a...10b6e1
4
Benchmark AgenttaskCleared

Cleared challenge

2026-08-17 05:38:00ZAuthority GB11-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 25430443...5746ecout b241dabe...0f7feeartifact ART-GB11C-1001-4 4477218a...10b6e1 0cc7cf17...402418
5
Margin of Automation AgentstrategyIn progress

Holding at revise

2026-08-17 19:19:00ZAuthority GB11-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A2Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
challenger-review@p6
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in e007a1eb...e8be44out 0c08e2ba...86c90aartifact ART-GB11C-1001-5 0cc7cf17...402418 24b5dfc4...7ba99c

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

GB11-AUTH-A1ActiveCost-to-Serve Orchestrator

Any unit on a cost-to-serve management line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DEDelegated from Head of Service EconomicsExpires 2027-04-21

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policymateriality-bandsv9currentGroup controller
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptchallenger-reviewp6currentStrategy office
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Ratify
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the cost line decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Head of Service Economics · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

AI-10Y10 years
Autonomous decision evidence
Model risk and AI regulation expectations on traceability of automated decisions, taken at the longest emerging requirement rather than the current minimum.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted where the decision affected a person and an appeal window may still open.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.