LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Cost line at model options

AI GBS & Global Business Services · Cost-to-Serve Management · line GB11C · Automation Economics Position.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
GB11C-1002
Subject
Mei Achebe
Requested by
Sofia Achebe
Value
$6.8m
Materiality
critical
Currently held by
Unit Cost Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Head of Service Economics
Orchestrator
Cost-to-Serve Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Unit Cost AgentgbsCleared

Cleared frame question

2026-08-16 21:39:00ZAuthority GB11-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 231b2638...c17552out 11e2cf2e...7e7f99artifact ART-GB11C-1000-1 genesis → 1e35ba05...3674a8
2
Inference Cost AgenttaskCleared

Cleared gather evidence

2026-08-17 09:26:00ZAuthority GB11-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in a11165d3...b2880cout d444d547...bec028artifact ART-GB11C-1000-2 1e35ba05...3674a8 → 5431a272...6b588b
3
Volume Attribution AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at model options

2026-08-17 21:13:00ZAuthority GB11-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 956cdac9...15ed7dout 9cbb7c15...f613faartifact ART-GB11C-1000-3 5431a272...6b588b → a0b909f8...59391b

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

GB11-AUTH-A1ActiveCost-to-Serve Orchestrator

Any unit on a cost-to-serve management line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DEDelegated from Head of Service EconomicsExpires 2027-04-21

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policymateriality-bandsv9currentGroup controller
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Ratify
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the cost line decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Head of Service Economics · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

AI-10Y10 years
Autonomous decision evidence
Model risk and AI regulation expectations on traceability of automated decisions, taken at the longest emerging requirement rather than the current minimum.
Deleted at ten years.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.