LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Improvement at close loop

AI GBS & Global Business Services · Continuous Improvement · line GB10B · Idea to Backlog. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
5
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
GB10B-1007
Subject
Daniel Marchetti
Requested by
Callum Adeyemi
Value
$80k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Experiment Design Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Head of Continuous Improvement
Orchestrator
Continuous Improvement Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Waste Detection AgentobserveCleared

Cleared intake

2026-08-18 05:00:00ZAuthority GB10-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 547958ab...e1d261out 26c5c2fe...ed4a70artifact ART-GB10B-1001-1 genesis 8b6a4a0e...c97ca9
2
Root Cause AgenttaskCleared

Cleared score

2026-08-18 05:48:00ZAuthority GB10-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 0789e6b2...82992bout f5085f60...23564aartifact ART-GB10B-1001-2 8b6a4a0e...c97ca9 fb9629fa...0b8142
3
Experiment Design AgenttaskCleared

Cleared route

2026-08-18 06:36:00ZAuthority GB10-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in ce490cea...fcc341out 71c28bc8...2ad70eartifact ART-GB10B-1001-3 fb9629fa...0b8142 4829e254...535f16
4
Benefit Measurement AgenttaskCleared

Cleared track

2026-08-18 07:24:00ZAuthority GB10-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in fad4253c...df0666out 4995e96b...33cc17artifact ART-GB10B-1001-4 4829e254...535f16 7b6918eb...9f2b90
5
Idea Intake AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at close loop

2026-08-18 08:12:00ZAuthority GB10-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in dbf62d94...9e4f77out 59560795...9bb2fcartifact ART-GB10B-1001-5 7b6918eb...9f2b90 b049f9cb...40d861

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

GB10-AUTH-A1ActiveContinuous Improvement Orchestrator

Any unit on a continuous improvement line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Head of Continuous ImprovementExpires 2026-11-23

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
modelobserve-signal3.1currentSensing guild
policymateriality-bandsv9currentGroup controller
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptobserve-scanp11currentSensing guild
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

This line runs without a formal gate.

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

AI-10Y10 years
Autonomous decision evidence
Model risk and AI regulation expectations on traceability of automated decisions, taken at the longest emerging requirement rather than the current minimum.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted where the decision affected a person and an appeal window may still open.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.