LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Technical position at draft answer

Finance · Controllership & Policy · line FI5B · Policy Query. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-001

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
FI5B-1052
Subject
Wren Nakamura
Requested by
Wren Farouk
Value
$78k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Judgment Documentation Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Chief Accounting Officer
Orchestrator
Controllership Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Accounting Policy AgentpolicyCleared

Cleared intake

2026-08-18 08:40:00ZAuthority FI5-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A2Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Prompt
gate-approval@p8
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 94603f2f...6c8d86out 55dfdd1b...2e6ab9artifact ART-FI5B-1007-1 genesis fed6334a...d73361
2
Accounting Policy AgentpolicyCleared

Cleared retrieve policy

2026-08-18 08:47:00ZAuthority FI5-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A2Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Prompt
gate-approval@p8
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in a24f215b...d63c08out 66049c19...3d5857artifact ART-FI5B-1007-2 fed6334a...d73361 97edc20f...c5fff9
3
Standards Watch AgentobserveIn progress

Holding at draft answer

2026-08-18 08:53:00ZAuthority FI5-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A2Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 2c854bc4...575c2eout 43dac229...b3f217artifact ART-FI5B-1007-3 97edc20f...c5fff9 a297fc21...ae0489

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

FI5-AUTH-A1ActiveControllership Orchestrator

Any unit on a controllership & policy line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FR · BRDelegated from Chief Accounting OfficerExpires 2026-10-09

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelobserve-signal3.1currentSensing guild
policymateriality-bandsv9currentGroup controller
promptgate-approvalp8currentGovernance office
promptobserve-scanp11currentSensing guild
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Controller review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the technical position decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Chief Accounting Officer · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

FIN-7Y7 years
Financial assertion evidence
Statutory accounting retention in the majority of operating jurisdictions, aligned to the longest applicable period rather than the shortest.
Deleted at seven years from the close of the reporting period, provided no legal hold is in force on the record or its unit.
HOLD-001active
Regulatory inquiry — cross-border payment routing
A regulator has asked how payments above the cross-border band were authorized in the two quarters before the materiality policy moved to v9. Deletion is suspended across the whole function rather than a narrower scope, because the inquiry has not yet named the lines it will examine.
Custodian Group General Counsel · requested by External counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.