LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Report at draft answer

Finance · Management Reporting · line FI3B · Ad-hoc Query. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 4 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
4
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-001

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
FI3B-1019
Subject
Wren Sorensen
Requested by
Idris Raman
Value
$74k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
P2P spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
Director, Management Reporting
Orchestrator
Management Reporting Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Report Assembly AgentgbsCleared

Cleared receive question

2026-08-18 04:41:00ZAuthority FI3-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A4Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 35c468c4...e2eb6dout 22916490...679441artifact ART-FI3B-1002-1 genesis f5872599...04dcec
2
Report Assembly AgentgbsCleared

Cleared interpret

2026-08-18 05:46:00ZAuthority FI3-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A4Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in b70c1a4e...01f85bout 7144847c...20a1cbartifact ART-FI3B-1002-2 f5872599...04dcec 6db47569...93f586
3
Report Assembly AgentgbsCleared

Cleared query

2026-08-18 06:50:00ZAuthority FI3-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A4Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 367e9806...2e7d55out 9ae1cafb...60c783artifact ART-FI3B-1002-3 6db47569...93f586 933db732...67f7e0
4
Report Assembly AgentgbsIn progress

Holding at draft answer

2026-08-18 07:55:00ZAuthority FI3-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A4Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in aab2b9eb...18071bout c0637a77...d9acc4artifact ART-FI3B-1002-4 933db732...67f7e0 41aaea04...eb243c

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

FI3-AUTH-A1ActiveManagement Reporting Orchestrator

Any unit on a management reporting line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DEDelegated from Director, Management ReportingExpires 2026-11-24

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policymateriality-bandsv9currentGroup controller
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Escalate ambiguity
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the report decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Management Reporting · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

FIN-7Y7 years
Financial assertion evidence
Statutory accounting retention in the majority of operating jurisdictions, aligned to the longest applicable period rather than the shortest.
Deleted at seven years from the close of the reporting period, provided no legal hold is in force on the record or its unit.
HOLD-001active
Regulatory inquiry — cross-border payment routing
A regulator has asked how payments above the cross-border band were authorized in the two quarters before the materiality policy moved to v9. Deletion is suspended across the whole function rather than a narrower scope, because the inquiry has not yet named the lines it will examine.
Custodian Group General Counsel · requested by External counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.