LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Report at draft narrative

Finance · Management Reporting · line FI3A · Monthly Reporting Pack. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-001

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
FI3A-1003
Subject
Simon Kaplan
Requested by
Tomas Costa
Value
$82k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
Self-service Query Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Management Reporting
Orchestrator
Management Reporting Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Report Assembly AgentgbsCleared

Cleared assemble

2026-08-18 07:28:00ZAuthority FI3-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A4Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 6cb5f835...f09eafout aac03686...02508aartifact ART-FI3A-1000-1 genesis e6b8eb2f...69c051
2
Report Assembly AgentgbsCleared

Cleared quality check

2026-08-18 07:59:00ZAuthority FI3-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A4Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 2e3da72c...60e02aout f238dc61...a05af7artifact ART-FI3A-1000-2 e6b8eb2f...69c051 f425bc16...26af55
3
Data Quality AgentobserveIn progress

Holding at draft narrative

2026-08-18 08:29:00ZAuthority FI3-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A4Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in f47358db...bca912out 1c6665ec...4e12b3artifact ART-FI3A-1000-3 f425bc16...26af55 2ca26b70...97cd3d

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

FI3-AUTH-A1ActiveManagement Reporting Orchestrator

Any unit on a management reporting line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DEDelegated from Director, Management ReportingExpires 2026-11-24

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
modelobserve-signal3.1currentSensing guild
policymateriality-bandsv9currentGroup controller
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptobserve-scanp11currentSensing guild
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Controller review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the report decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Management Reporting · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

FIN-7Y7 years
Financial assertion evidence
Statutory accounting retention in the majority of operating jurisdictions, aligned to the longest applicable period rather than the shortest.
Deleted at seven years from the close of the reporting period, provided no legal hold is in force on the record or its unit.
HOLD-001active
Regulatory inquiry — cross-border payment routing
A regulator has asked how payments above the cross-border band were authorized in the two quarters before the materiality policy moved to v9. Deletion is suspended across the whole function rather than a narrower scope, because the inquiry has not yet named the lines it will examine.
Custodian Group General Counsel · requested by External counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.