LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Budget line at challenge sessions

Finance · Budgeting & Forecasting · line FI2A · Annual Budget Cycle. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 5 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
5
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-001

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
FI2A-1058
Subject
Sofia Bianchi
Requested by
Jonas Brennan
Value
$11k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
Consolidation Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Budgeting
Orchestrator
Budget Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Budget Build AgentgbsCleared

Cleared issue templates

2026-08-18 08:52:00ZAuthority FI2-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A3Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 64089af4...1a3f32out dea4490f...85c70aartifact ART-FI2A-1008-1 genesis 57b9d244...ae2d27
2
Budget Build AgentgbsCleared

Cleared chase submissions

2026-08-18 08:54:00ZAuthority FI2-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A3Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 2bcfb975...0c20ecout 8d597c48...9ad98cartifact ART-FI2A-1008-2 57b9d244...ae2d27 bb348c80...c9e515
3
Budget Build AgentgbsCleared

Cleared validate

2026-08-18 08:55:00ZAuthority FI2-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A3Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 6b2c250c...0859a0out ad0386ca...cac97fartifact ART-FI2A-1008-3 bb348c80...c9e515 db513ccf...ed021d
4
Budget Build AgentgbsCleared

Cleared consolidate

2026-08-18 08:57:00ZAuthority FI2-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A3Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in ee97408e...cf9ae8out 1e1684cd...3faca7artifact ART-FI2A-1008-4 db513ccf...ed021d a291cf7b...86c2d5
5
Director, Budgetinggate-approverIn progress

Holding at challenge sessions

2026-08-18 08:58:00ZAuthority FI2-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction UKAutonomy A0Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
none
in 564faa0c...5541c0out 78a794a6...4e8b13artifact ART-FI2A-1008-5 a291cf7b...86c2d5 84b86622...9a4bbd

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

FI2-AUTH-A1ActiveBudget Orchestrator

Any unit on a budgeting & forecasting line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from Director, BudgetingExpires 2026-12-05
FI2-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, Budgeting

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from Finance leadershipExpires 2027-07-18

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policymateriality-bandsv9currentGroup controller
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Challenge sessions
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the budget line decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Budgeting · cleared on this chain
Executive approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the budget line decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Budgeting · not reached
Board approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the budget line decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Budgeting · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

FIN-7Y7 years
Financial assertion evidence
Statutory accounting retention in the majority of operating jurisdictions, aligned to the longest applicable period rather than the shortest.
Deleted at seven years from the close of the reporting period, provided no legal hold is in force on the record or its unit.
HOLD-001active
Regulatory inquiry — cross-border payment routing
A regulator has asked how payments above the cross-border band were authorized in the two quarters before the materiality policy moved to v9. Deletion is suspended across the whole function rather than a narrower scope, because the inquiry has not yet named the lines it will examine.
Custodian Group General Counsel · requested by External counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.