Auditor evidence pack
Analysis at business partner review
Finance · FP&A & Planning · line FI1A · Monthly Business Review. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.
Chain verified
Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 6 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.
hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})
Records
6
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
5
Taken by software
Human actions
1
Taken by a named person
Refusals
1
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-001
The unit
What the work was, and where it sits
Reference
FI1A-1024
Subject
Maeve Bianchi
Requested by
Elena Farouk
Value
$1.2m
Materiality
high
Currently held by
VP Financial Planning & Analysis (human)
Sub-function owner
VP Financial Planning & Analysis
Orchestrator
FP&A Orchestrator
Every action, in order
Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it
1
FP&A OrchestratororchestratorCleared
Cleared ingest actuals
2026-08-17 22:34:00ZAuthority FI1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Model
Prompt
orchestrator-brief@p14
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12, notify-and-route@t5
in 5037115f...3dcbfeout c99d3718...cab89aartifact ART-FI1A-1003-1 genesis → d31dbd70...4449c3
2
Scenario Modeling AgenttaskCleared
Cleared explain variance
2026-08-18 00:39:00ZAuthority FI1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Model
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in e078a7c1...5941e8out e3a91b7d...00f222artifact ART-FI1A-1003-2 d31dbd70...4449c3 → f82b7371...e25b6a
3
Variance Explanation AgenttaskCleared
Cleared refresh drivers
2026-08-18 02:44:00ZAuthority FI1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Model
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 072a4a9c...27ab02out 6caef9cd...c4089bartifact ART-FI1A-1003-3 f82b7371...e25b6a → 1562087b...edc5a4
4
Commentary Drafting AgenttaskCleared
Cleared draft commentary
2026-08-18 04:50:00ZAuthority FI1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Model
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 4ed24edf...a7c5e5out 3d53414d...ab7bd6artifact ART-FI1A-1003-4 1562087b...edc5a4 → 94f231e0...f99dfe
5
FP&A OrchestratororchestratorRefused
Attempted clearance above the delegated cap
2026-08-18 06:52:00ZAuthority FI1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention AI-10YLegal hold HOLD-001
Model
Prompt
orchestrator-brief@p14
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12, notify-and-route@t5
in dca3e639...cc3c0eout fa003874...fec344artifact ART-FI1A-5-refusal 94f231e0...f99dfe → 98e1d1e8...61f389
6
VP Financial Planning & Analysisgate-approverHeld
Holding at business partner review
2026-08-18 06:55:00ZAuthority FI1-AUTH-H1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A0Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
none
in 4cd80613...27bcbaout 0637d65c...d204dbartifact ART-FI1A-1003-6 98e1d1e8...61f389 → 4ee497d6...ea980b
Authority relied on
Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions
Any unit on a fp&a & planning line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.
Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from VP Financial Planning & AnalysisExpires 2026-10-06
Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.
Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Finance leadershipExpires 2027-04-25
Versions in force
Exactly what was running when these actions were taken
| Kind | Identifier | Version | Status | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| model | reasoner-core | 5.4 | current | Platform model council |
| model | extract-lite | 2.9 | current | Platform model council |
| policy | materiality-bands | v9 | current | Group controller |
| prompt | orchestrator-brief | p14 | current | Chief of Staff office |
| prompt | task-execution | p21 | current | Shared service engineering |
| toolset | read-only-lookup | t12 | current | Platform engineering |
| toolset | notify-and-route | t5 | current | Platform engineering |
| toolset | document-fetch | t9 | current | Shared service engineering |
Gates on this line
The control points this unit had to clear
Business partner review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the analysis decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Financial Planning & Analysis · cleared on this chain
CFO review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the analysis decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Financial Planning & Analysis · not reached
Records schedule and holds
How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen
AI-10Y10 years
Autonomous decision evidence
Model risk and AI regulation expectations on traceability of automated decisions, taken at the longest emerging requirement rather than the current minimum.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted where the decision affected a person and an appeal window may still open.
FIN-7Y7 years
Financial assertion evidence
Statutory accounting retention in the majority of operating jurisdictions, aligned to the longest applicable period rather than the shortest.
Deleted at seven years from the close of the reporting period, provided no legal hold is in force on the record or its unit.
HOLD-001active
Regulatory inquiry — cross-border payment routing
A regulator has asked how payments above the cross-border band were authorized in the two quarters before the materiality policy moved to v9. Deletion is suspended across the whole function rather than a narrower scope, because the inquiry has not yet named the lines it will examine.
Custodian Group General Counsel · requested by External counsel
What this pack proves, and what it does not
Read this before you rely on it
It does prove
- Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
- Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
- Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
- Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
- The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
- It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
- The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
- Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.