Auditor evidence pack

Analysis at publish

Finance · FP&A & Planning · line FI1A · Monthly Business Review. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 6 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records

Append-only, sequenced

Agent actions

Taken by software

Human actions

Taken by a named person

Refusals

Blocked by the authority register

Corrections

Later record supersedes an earlier one

Legal hold

Held

HOLD-001

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference

FI1A-1003

Subject

Naomi Tanaka

Requested by

Anika Achebe

Value

$1.7m

Materiality

high

Currently held by

P2P spine (gbs)

Sub-function owner

VP Financial Planning & Analysis

Orchestrator

FP&A Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

Variance Explanation AgenttaskCleared

Cleared refresh drivers

2026-08-16 20:16:00ZAuthority FI1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001

Model

[email protected]

Prompt

task-execution@p21

Policy

materiality-bands@v9

Tools

document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12

in 08b3f81c...527f18out 7c334525...3d697eartifact ART-FI1A-1000-1 genesis → 8792ef4d...7db554

Commentary Drafting AgenttaskCleared

Cleared draft commentary

2026-08-17 03:37:00ZAuthority FI1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001

Model

[email protected]

Prompt

task-execution@p21

Policy

materiality-bands@v9

Tools

document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12

in 986d8a1e...54d11fout b639cf5f...d94c48artifact ART-FI1A-1000-2 8792ef4d...7db554 → 91dfaf40...4bd1fc

VP Financial Planning & Analysisaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared business partner review

2026-08-17 10:58:00ZAuthority FI1-AUTH-H1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A0Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001

Model

human@n-a

Prompt

human@n-a

Policy

materiality-bands@v9

Tools

none

in 58a93054...342054out 1433d556...23e178artifact ART-FI1A-1000-3 91dfaf40...4bd1fc → f2a8c430...51a19e

VP Financial Planning & Analysisaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared cfo review

2026-08-17 18:18:00ZAuthority FI1-AUTH-H1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A0Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001

Model

human@n-a

Prompt

human@n-a

Policy

materiality-bands@v9

Tools

none

in d0efaa4a...609fa7out 89a9bc75...781664artifact ART-FI1A-1000-4 f2a8c430...51a19e → a225137c...218c09

FP&A OrchestratororchestratorRefused

Attempted clearance above the delegated cap

2026-08-18 01:36:00ZAuthority FI1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention AI-10YLegal hold HOLD-001

Model

[email protected]

Prompt

orchestrator-brief@p14

Policy

materiality-bands@v9

Tools

read-only-lookup@t12, notify-and-route@t5

in 19807f91...41ee80out aec55fe8...ed2f9dartifact ART-FI1A-5-refusal a225137c...218c09 → e36c4e93...d7c1d0

Capital Allocation AgentstrategyIn progress

Holding at publish

2026-08-18 01:39:00ZAuthority FI1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A2Retention FIN-7YLegal hold HOLD-001

Model

[email protected]

Prompt

challenger-review@p6

Policy

materiality-bands@v9

Tools

read-only-lookup@t12

in 65c438c3...ae594aout 7618051e...751156artifact ART-FI1A-1000-6 e36c4e93...d7c1d0 → 2612b3b6...6dae49

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

FI1-AUTH-A1ActiveFP&A Orchestrator

Any unit on a fp&a & planning line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from VP Financial Planning & AnalysisExpires 2026-10-06

FI1-AUTH-H1ActiveVP Financial Planning & Analysis

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Finance leadershipExpires 2027-04-25

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

Kind	Identifier	Version	Status	Owner
model	reasoner-core	5.4	current	Platform model council
model	extract-lite	2.9	current	Platform model council
policy	materiality-bands	v9	current	Group controller
prompt	orchestrator-brief	p14	current	Chief of Staff office
prompt	task-execution	p21	current	Shared service engineering
prompt	challenger-review	p6	current	Strategy office
toolset	read-only-lookup	t12	current	Platform engineering
toolset	notify-and-route	t5	current	Platform engineering
toolset	document-fetch	t9	current	Shared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Business partner review

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the analysis decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

Approver: VP Financial Planning & Analysis · not reached

CFO review

Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the analysis decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.

Approver: VP Financial Planning & Analysis · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

AI-10Y10 years

Autonomous decision evidence

Model risk and AI regulation expectations on traceability of automated decisions, taken at the longest emerging requirement rather than the current minimum.

Deleted at ten years. Never deleted where the decision affected a person and an appeal window may still open.

FIN-7Y7 years

Financial assertion evidence

Statutory accounting retention in the majority of operating jurisdictions, aligned to the longest applicable period rather than the shortest.

Deleted at seven years from the close of the reporting period, provided no legal hold is in force on the record or its unit.

HOLD-001active

Regulatory inquiry — cross-border payment routing

A regulator has asked how payments above the cross-border band were authorized in the two quarters before the materiality policy moved to v9. Deletion is suspended across the whole function rather than a narrower scope, because the inquiry has not yet named the lines it will examine.

Custodian Group General Counsel · requested by External counsel

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove

Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.

It does not prove

It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.