LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Pull request at enforce

Engineering · Code Review & Quality · line EN4C · Convention Change. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 4 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
4
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
2
Taken by software
Human actions
2
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
EN4C-1039
Subject
Marcus Okafor
Requested by
Wren Voss
Value
$28k
Materiality
low
Currently held by
GBS spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
Director, Engineering Quality
Orchestrator
Code Quality Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Static Analysis AgenttaskCleared

Cleared propose

2026-08-18 06:48:00ZAuthority EN4-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 1391ea04...62a7a4out 05924fca...fa445eartifact ART-EN4C-1005-1 genesis de680100...070eb2
2
Director, Engineering Qualityaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared team review

2026-08-18 07:21:00ZAuthority EN4-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A0Retention TECH-3Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
none
in f4b44833...d8f9ffout 750c73f2...559145artifact ART-EN4C-1005-2 de680100...070eb2 51b8899b...20a62d
3
Director, Engineering Qualityaccountable-ownerCleared

Cleared ratify

2026-08-18 07:54:00ZAuthority EN4-AUTH-H1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A0Retention TECH-3Y
Model
human@n-a
Prompt
human@n-a
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
none
in 3a4f9658...c1baa5out d049a120...fb1d96artifact ART-EN4C-1005-3 51b8899b...20a62d 0e49094d...780c89
4
Complexity MonitorobserveIn progress

Holding at enforce

2026-08-18 08:27:00ZAuthority EN4-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A4Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
observe-scan@p11
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in b4e089cf...64e128out 196de878...982089artifact ART-EN4C-1005-4 0e49094d...780c89 00ad4234...393808

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

EN4-AUTH-A1ActiveCode Quality Orchestrator

Any unit on a code review & quality line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Director, Engineering QualityExpires 2026-10-30
EN4-AUTH-H1ActiveDirector, Engineering Quality

Anything the agent grant refuses, plus any override of an agent outcome. An override must state what the agent concluded and why it is being set aside.

Cap $25,000,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Engineering leadershipExpires 2026-10-08

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
modelobserve-signal3.1currentSensing guild
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
promptobserve-scanp11currentSensing guild
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Team review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the pull request decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Engineering Quality · not reached
Ratify
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the pull request decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Engineering Quality · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

TECH-3Y3 years
Technology change and access evidence
Security review and change audit requirement.
Deleted at three years from the change closing.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.