LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Request at draft recommendation

Engineering · Portfolio & Intake · line EN1B · Capacity Rebalance. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 4 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
4
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
4
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
1
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
EN1B-1003
Subject
Clara Ito
Requested by
Grace Achebe
Value
$1.8m
Materiality
high
Currently held by
Value Scoring Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
VP Engineering Operations
Orchestrator
Engineering Intake Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Request Triage AgenttaskCleared

Cleared model demand

2026-08-17 17:25:00ZAuthority EN1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 146c8d43...36f6bcout 164532f4...4bb677artifact ART-EN1B-1000-1 genesis 07071072...0ef5b8
2
Effort Estimation AgenttaskCleared

Cleared model capacity

2026-08-17 22:37:00ZAuthority EN1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 303ac634...a60e5dout 6c57eca7...ff2e9bartifact ART-EN1B-1000-2 07071072...0ef5b8 492413a9...13569b
3
Engineering Intake OrchestratororchestratorRefused

Attempted clearance above the delegated cap

2026-08-18 03:45:00ZAuthority EN1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention AI-10Y
Prompt
orchestrator-brief@p14
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12, notify-and-route@t5
in 8a69aee6...d60bf9out fa556855...7ea994artifact ART-EN1B-3-refusal 492413a9...13569b c653dcc1...95ef1f
4
Dependency Mapping AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at draft recommendation

2026-08-18 03:48:00ZAuthority EN1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction USAutonomy A3Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 4558960d...642bedout 50157d76...f4f445artifact ART-EN1B-1000-4 c653dcc1...95ef1f f71cbbd8...d84efa

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

EN1-AUTH-A1ActiveEngineering Intake Orchestrator

Any unit on a portfolio & intake line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from VP Engineering OperationsExpires 2027-01-07

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
promptorchestrator-briefp14currentChief of Staff office
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetnotify-and-routet5currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Leader review
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the request decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: VP Engineering Operations · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

TECH-3Y3 years
Technology change and access evidence
Security review and change audit requirement.
Deleted at three years from the change closing.
AI-10Y10 years
Autonomous decision evidence
Model risk and AI regulation expectations on traceability of automated decisions, taken at the longest emerging requirement rather than the current minimum.
Deleted at ten years. Never deleted where the decision affected a person and an appeal window may still open.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.