LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Finding at frame system

Engineering · Security Engineering · line EN10C · Threat Model Review. This pack names every action taken on this unit, who or what took it, the authority that permitted it, and the model, prompt and policy versions in force at that moment.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 1 record were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
1
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
1
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
None
Free to age out on schedule

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
EN10C-1008
Subject
Oscar Delgado
Requested by
Leila Kaplan
Value
$2.8m
Materiality
high
Currently held by
Dependency Risk Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Security Engineering
Orchestrator
Security Engineering Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Vulnerability Scanning AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at frame system

2026-08-16 11:46:00ZAuthority EN10-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention TECH-3Y
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
segregation-of-duties@v4
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 7c3ef29c...5d9fc4out 90045d92...75a878artifact ART-EN10C-1001-1 genesis eb67f372...26b411

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

EN10-AUTH-A1ActiveSecurity Engineering Orchestrator

Any unit on a security engineering line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AUDelegated from Director, Security EngineeringExpires 2026-12-07

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policysegregation-of-dutiesv4currentInternal audit
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Security lead ratify
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the finding decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Security Engineering · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

TECH-3Y3 years
Technology change and access evidence
Security review and change audit requirement.
Deleted at three years from the change closing.

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why; the earlier record is never edited or deleted.
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis. Making that impossible requires publishing chain tips to a store this application cannot write to. That anchor is not built, and this page does not claim it.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action. Cryptographic agent identity and signed attestation are a separate piece of work.