LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Quality review at score

Customer Service · Quality & Coaching · line CS9A · Sample to Coaching Action.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 2 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
2
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
2
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-005

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
CS9A-1010
Subject
Hannah Muller
Requested by
Idris Petrov
Value
$64k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
GBS spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
Director, Service Quality
Orchestrator
Quality Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Quality OrchestratororchestratorCleared

Cleared sample

2026-08-18 03:47:00ZAuthority CS9-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention CUST-5YLegal hold HOLD-005
Prompt
orchestrator-brief@p14
Policy
customer-commitments@v5
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12, notify-and-route@t5
in 728865e0...fa9a3eout 0e4f45c3...c89e23artifact ART-CS9A-1001-1 genesis → 62ba998e...191ae1
2
Interaction Sampling AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at score

2026-08-18 06:23:00ZAuthority CS9-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction DEAutonomy A3Retention CUST-5YLegal hold HOLD-005
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
customer-commitments@v5
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 652538c9...750be0out 6e80e980...8d0085artifact ART-CS9A-1001-2 62ba998e...191ae1 → f6d12ea1...389a7a

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

CS9-AUTH-A1ActiveQuality Orchestrator

Any unit on a quality & coaching line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Director, Service QualityExpires 2027-06-11

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policycustomer-commitmentsv5currentChief revenue officer
promptorchestrator-briefp14currentChief of Staff office
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetnotify-and-routet5currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Deliver
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the quality review decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Service Quality · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

CUST-5Y5 years
Customer commitment and service evidence
Consumer claim windows and revenue recognition audit trail.
Deleted at five years from the last account activity.
HOLD-005active
Customer complaint escalation — service credits
A pattern of service credit refusals was raised with a consumer regulator.
Custodian Head of Consumer Law · requested by Chief Customer Officer

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.