LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Analysis at gather evidence

Customer Service · Service Analytics · line CS11C · Cost-to-Serve Position.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 2 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
2
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
2
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-005

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
CS11C-1008
Subject
Elena Marchetti
Requested by
Idris Marchetti
Value
$40.1m
Materiality
critical
Currently held by
Cost-to-Serve Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Head of Service Analytics
Orchestrator
Service Analytics Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Metric Assembly AgentgbsCleared

Cleared frame question

2026-08-14 00:52:00ZAuthority CS11-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A3Retention CUST-5YLegal hold HOLD-005
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
customer-commitments@v5
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 4f204581...c0052aout 7b7aaadf...5497c1artifact ART-CS11C-1001-1 genesis → f19a6661...10e2e9
2
Cost-to-Serve AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at gather evidence

2026-08-16 04:56:00ZAuthority CS11-AUTH-A1 · cap $25,000,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A3Retention CUST-5YLegal hold HOLD-005
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
customer-commitments@v5
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 6148c53a...3e510fout e0ca1462...a51048artifact ART-CS11C-1001-2 f19a6661...10e2e9 → d6e4fafd...b911ed

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

CS11-AUTH-A1ActiveService Analytics Orchestrator

Any unit on a service analytics line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $25,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Head of Service AnalyticsExpires 2027-03-02

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policycustomer-commitmentsv5currentChief revenue officer
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Ratify
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the analysis decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Head of Service Analytics · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

CUST-5Y5 years
Customer commitment and service evidence
Consumer claim windows and revenue recognition audit trail.
Deleted at five years from the last account activity.
HOLD-005active
Customer complaint escalation — service credits
A pattern of service credit refusals was raised with a consumer regulator.
Custodian Head of Consumer Law · requested by Chief Customer Officer

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.