LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Asset at dispatch

Administration · Fleet & Assets · line AD7B · Maintenance Cycle.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-004

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
AD7B-1004
Subject
Amara Rhodes
Requested by
Jonas Ellery
Value
$70k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
S2P spine (gbs)
Sub-function owner
Director, Fleet & Assets
Orchestrator
Fleet & Asset Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Asset Register AgentgbsCleared

Cleared telematics signal

2026-08-18 07:50:00ZAuthority AD7-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention OPS-3YLegal hold HOLD-004
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 081ca8a1...7c2fb5out 74f00b2b...ccbb0dartifact ART-AD7B-1000-1 genesis → ab852195...31a61f
2
Utilization AgenttaskCleared

Cleared schedule

2026-08-18 08:13:00ZAuthority AD7-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention OPS-3YLegal hold HOLD-004
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 746f7722...b6460eout a23db1e2...b852e7artifact ART-AD7B-1000-2 ab852195...31a61f → 45bdaf0a...a0e05f
3
Asset Register AgentgbsIn progress

Holding at dispatch

2026-08-18 08:37:00ZAuthority AD7-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction SGAutonomy A3Retention OPS-3YLegal hold HOLD-004
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 6eb05f9e...9c77dfout 7856faa0...a13105artifact ART-AD7B-1000-3 45bdaf0a...a0e05f → c0c1d219...6ca735

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

AD7-AUTH-A1ActiveFleet & Asset Orchestrator

Any unit on a fleet & assets line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $2,000,000US · UK · DEDelegated from Director, Fleet & AssetsExpires 2026-11-08

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policymateriality-bandsv9currentGroup controller
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

This line runs without a formal gate.

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

OPS-3Y3 years
Operational routing and execution
Internal operating requirement. No statutory driver, so the shortest defensible period is used deliberately.
Deleted at three years.
HOLD-004active
Internal investigation — expense approvals
A pattern of approvals just under a materiality threshold was flagged by the observe layer and is being examined.
Custodian Head of Internal Investigations · requested by Audit committee

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.