LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Expense report at contact

Administration · Travel & Expense · line AD3C · Duty of Care Response.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
0
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-004

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
AD3C-1017
Subject
Leila Okafor
Requested by
Hannah Tanaka
Value
$54k
Materiality
medium
Currently held by
T&E Policy Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Travel & Expense
Orchestrator
Travel & Expense Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Policy Check AgentpolicyCleared

Cleared disruption signal

2026-08-18 03:56:00ZAuthority AD3-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A2Retention OPS-3YLegal hold HOLD-004
Prompt
gate-approval@p8
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12
in 6eed195a...811e84out 8071ee00...9104e6artifact ART-AD3C-1002-1 genesis → 7cd26083...d3346e
2
Booking Optimization AgenttaskCleared

Cleared locate travelers

2026-08-18 05:37:00ZAuthority AD3-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A4Retention OPS-3YLegal hold HOLD-004
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 5bdf23f1...67f967out 16ddfb73...53c884artifact ART-AD3C-1002-2 7cd26083...d3346e → 22f9eef3...682cef
3
Receipt Extraction AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at contact

2026-08-18 07:19:00ZAuthority AD3-AUTH-A1 · cap $250,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A4Retention OPS-3YLegal hold HOLD-004
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in bb0b70c5...a79d41out bca4742f...4a79cfartifact ART-AD3C-1002-3 22f9eef3...682cef → 85773107...deb817

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

AD3-AUTH-A1ActiveTravel & Expense Orchestrator

Any unit on a travel & expense line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SG · AU · FR · BRDelegated from Director, Travel & ExpenseExpires 2026-09-30

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policymateriality-bandsv9currentGroup controller
promptgate-approvalp8currentGovernance office
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

This line runs without a formal gate.

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

OPS-3Y3 years
Operational routing and execution
Internal operating requirement. No statutory driver, so the shortest defensible period is used deliberately.
Deleted at three years.
HOLD-004active
Internal investigation — expense approvals
A pattern of approvals just under a materiality threshold was flagged by the observe layer and is being examined.
Custodian Head of Internal Investigations · requested by Audit committee

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.