LensReading which lens this session carries.

Auditor evidence pack

Work order at model demand

Administration · Facilities & Workplace · line AD1C · Space Reallocation.

Chain verified

Every record links to the one before it and hashes to its stored value. 3 records were re-hashed on this page load, in order, starting from the genesis value. Nothing was read from a cached verdict.

hash = sha256(prevHash + "|" + JSON{seq, unitRef, actor, action, outcome, occurredAt})

Records
3
Append-only, sequenced
Agent actions
3
Taken by software
Human actions
0
Taken by a named person
Refusals
1
Blocked by the authority register
Corrections
0
Later record supersedes an earlier one
Legal hold
Held
HOLD-004

The unit

What the work was, and where it sits

Reference
AD1C-1005
Subject
Marcus Achebe
Requested by
Rafael Tanaka
Value
$1.3m
Materiality
high
Currently held by
Space Utilization Agent (agent)
Sub-function owner
Director, Workplace Services
Orchestrator
Workplace Operations Orchestrator

Every action, in order

Actor, authority, versions in force, and the hash link to the record before it

1
Space Utilization AgentgbsCleared

Cleared sense occupancy

2026-08-17 13:57:00ZAuthority AD1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A4Retention OPS-3YLegal hold HOLD-004
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
ledger-write@t7, document-fetch@t9
in 6ea5fc11...6cb6c0out f826c4fd...8aae4aartifact ART-AD1C-1000-1 genesis → f670784e...c14519
2
Workplace Operations OrchestratororchestratorRefused

Attempted clearance above the delegated cap

2026-08-17 23:25:00ZAuthority AD1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A3Retention AI-10YLegal hold HOLD-004
Prompt
orchestrator-brief@p14
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
read-only-lookup@t12, notify-and-route@t5
in 50645b04...1c304eout 96d82b6f...fa2800artifact ART-AD1C-2-refusal f670784e...c14519 → 10f63351...bf792a
3
Work Order Triage AgenttaskIn progress

Holding at model demand

2026-08-17 23:28:00ZAuthority AD1-AUTH-A1 · cap $2,000,000Jurisdiction AUAutonomy A4Retention OPS-3YLegal hold HOLD-004
Prompt
task-execution@p21
Policy
materiality-bands@v9
Tools
document-fetch@t9, read-only-lookup@t12
in 9dad6895...ef3e3bout d914a21d...d50616artifact ART-AD1C-1000-3 10f63351...bf792a → 4012939f...780d24

Authority relied on

Who was allowed to do this, up to what value, in which jurisdictions

AD1-AUTH-A1ActiveWorkplace Operations Orchestrator

Any unit on a facilities & workplace line where every intake check passed, the policy in force is current, and the value sits inside the cap below.

Cap $250,000US · UK · DE · SGDelegated from Director, Workplace ServicesExpires 2027-01-27

Versions in force

Exactly what was running when these actions were taken

KindIdentifierVersionStatusOwner
modelreasoner-core5.4currentPlatform model council
modelextract-lite2.9currentPlatform model council
policymateriality-bandsv9currentGroup controller
promptorchestrator-briefp14currentChief of Staff office
prompttask-executionp21currentShared service engineering
toolsetledger-writet7currentFinance systems
toolsetread-only-lookupt12currentPlatform engineering
toolsetnotify-and-routet5currentPlatform engineering
toolsetdocument-fetcht9currentShared service engineering

Gates on this line

The control points this unit had to clear

Approve
Held for a named human when the unit exceeds the work order decision envelope, when confidence falls below the floor, or when a policy clause is engaged.
Approver: Director, Workplace Services · not reached

Records schedule and holds

How long this evidence must be kept, and whether it is frozen

OPS-3Y3 years
Operational routing and execution
Internal operating requirement. No statutory driver, so the shortest defensible period is used deliberately.
Deleted at three years.
AI-10Y10 years
Autonomous decision evidence
Model risk and AI regulation expectations on traceability of automated decisions, taken at the longest emerging requirement rather than the current minimum.
Deleted at ten years.
HOLD-004active
Internal investigation — expense approvals
A pattern of approvals just under a materiality threshold was flagged by the observe layer and is being examined.
Custodian Head of Internal Investigations · requested by Audit committee

What this pack proves, and what it does not

Read this before you rely on it

It does prove
  • Every action carries a named actor, an actor kind, and a timestamp.
  • Every action names the authority grant that permitted it and the cap that grant carries.
  • Every action stamps the model, prompt, policy and tool versions in force at that moment.
  • Corrections are additive. A later record supersedes an earlier one and says why
  • The chain is re-hashed live on this page, so a single altered field is detected immediately.
It does not prove
  • It is not tamper-proof against an attacker with write access to the store, who could rewrite the whole chain from genesis.
  • The evidence in this demonstration is modeled from a simulated estate, not captured from production systems.
  • Identity here is the actor name recorded on the action.