LensReading which lens this session carries.
CS6C-1000In flightmedium materiality

Field job at approve

Anika Novak

Customer Service · Field Service Dispatch · CS6C Parts Escalation

$74k

value

89%

confidence

39

people affected

51m

age

48m

sla

60%

progress

Currently held by

Dispatch Policy Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Grace Marchetti

Requester of record

At station

Approve

Policy layer · station 3 of 5

Where this train is on the line

CS6CParts EscalationTransactional · 5 stations

Detect shortage

29 q

Source alternative

29 q

Approve

1 live

Reschedule

25 q

Notify

0 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared detect shortage

    -51m

    Job Qualification Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared source alternative

    -34m

    Skills Matching Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Holding at approve

    -17m

    Director, Field Service

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Reschedule

run by Parts Availability Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 51m against a commitment of 48m · 106% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 39 records or people downstream
state in-flight — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 3m · 39 people or records downstream of this decision