The work elsewhere
Gaps something must have filled
Where an outcome chain jumps from one recorded step to the next with time and a state change in between, something did that work and the platform did not see it. 16 gaps of that kind are open across 14 functions, seen 1,389 times in the chains behind them. Each one is a hypothesis about unobserved work, not a finding.
Every gap on the record
Sorted as raised. The signal is what the chain shows; the hypothesis is what somebody thinks fills it. The two are kept apart on purpose.
Where the gaps sit
A function with no line here is not a function with no unobserved work. It is a function where nothing has been raised.
How sure anybody is
Confidence is the raiser's own judgment about whether the gap is real work or a recording artifact. It is not a measurement.
Actions
What is waiting on a person
Each of these is a gap in an outcome chain that something must have filled. None of them is a finding. The action is to find the work or to close the candidate.
chains sitting behind a gap nobody has filed
SP-0005 · SP-0013 · SP-0014 · SP-0016. Until the work behind these is filed through intake, every one of those chains stays in the unseen share of the coverage statement.
candidates nobody has accounted for
A candidate is a hypothesis with a gap behind it and no filing in front of it. Until somebody files the work through intake or explains the gap another way, the coverage figure for that function stays where it is.
candidate blocked from being pursued
SP-0016, Payment proposed to Payment released. Blocked means somebody decided the gap should not be closed by this platform. The candidate stays visible rather than being deleted.
hypothesis the evidence barely supports
A weak hypothesis is kept because deleting it would make the board look more certain than the evidence is. It should be read as a question, not as a claim about what people are doing.
Operations
What this desk is allowed to start
A surface that only reports is not operable. This is the work this page can set in motion, and the bound it runs into.
Trigger and bound
This surface raises a gap as a candidate unobserved process and tracks it to a filing. It cannot observe the work. Confirming a candidate requires somebody to file the missing work through intake, and the confirmation is what moves the coverage figure.
Live observability
What the record shows right now
All 16 candidates by how strongly the chain evidence supports the hypothesis, 3 grades in use. Confidence is about the evidence for a gap existing, never about whether the guess at what fills it is right.
Current distribution
16 candidates
Is policy and strategy coming to fruition
Whether the written intent is holding here
Yes, and it is the only mechanism here that improves the coverage figure.
Holding on the record
The intent was that a gap is raised rather than smoothed over, and that confirming one is how coverage improves over time instead of being guessed once. 12 of 16 candidates have been confirmed by a filing, across 14 functions and 1,389 observed instances of the gap. The honest limit is that the board only covers chains the platform can already see the ends of. A process with no observed step on either side of it leaves no gap to notice.