LensReading which lens this session carries.
PR8B-1013Human holdmedium materiality

Requisition at approve

Leila Kowalski

Procurement & Source-to-Pay · Requisition & PO · PR8B Non-catalog Request

$49k

value

47%

confidence

259

people affected

14h 42m

age

11h 44m

sla

80%

progress

Currently held by

Director, Procurement Operations

A person owns the next move

Raised by

Ethan Novak

Requester of record

At station

Approve

Policy layer · station 4 of 5

Where this train is on the line

PR8BNon-catalog RequestTransactional · 5 stations

Request

13 q

Classify

9 q

Sourcing check

23 q

Approve

1 live

Issue PO

3 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared request

    -882m

    Guided Buying Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  2. Cleared classify

    -662m

    Catalog Match Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  3. Cleared sourcing check

    -441m

    Budget Check Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

  4. Holding at approve

    -221m

    Director, Procurement Operations

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Issue PO

run by Guided Buying Agent · AI GBS layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Handed to the AI GBS depot

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Red. This item is past the time it was committed to and it is either high or critical materiality or wide enough downstream to matter. Red says nothing about who holds it: an item can be red and still be moving through an agent that has not stopped.

clock 14h 42m against a commitment of 11h 44m · 125% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 259 records or people downstream
state human-hold — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 2h 58m · 259 people or records downstream of this decision

Open the escalation lane