LensReading which lens this session carries.
Enterprise network/Procurement & Source-to-Pay/PR5C/PR5C-1003
PR5C-1003Evidence postedmedium materiality

Supplier contract at assess value

Clara Delgado

Procurement & Source-to-Pay · Contract Execution · PR5C Expiry & Renewal Sweep

$92k

value

81%

confidence

14

people affected

5h 53m

age

4h 57m

sla

40%

progress

Currently held by

Contract Repository Agent

An agent owns the next move

Raised by

Hiro Tanaka

Requester of record

At station

Assess value

Workflow layer · station 2 of 5

Where this train is on the line

PR5CExpiry & Renewal SweepTransactional · 5 stations

Detect expiry

7 q

Assess value

1 live

Recommend

7 q

Owner decision

5 q

Route to sourcing

14 q

Evidence trail

Every station this unit has passed, who acted, and what they left behind

Auditor pack

This is the readable trail.

  1. Cleared detect expiry

    -353m

    Template Selection Agent

    Spine control pack posted, three-way evidence attached

  2. Holding at assess value

    -177m

    Terms Assembly Agent

    Inputs, rule version and output hash written to the evidence log

What happens next

The next station and its rule

Recommend

run by Legal Routing Agent · Workflow layer

No gate here. The agent clears this station inside its envelope and posts evidence.

Why the signal is what it is

Derived from time against commitment, not from the state

Amber. Either this item is at or past the time it was committed to and is not material enough to escalate, or it is inside the time but has burned three quarters of it while carrying high or critical materiality. Amber says nothing about who holds it: an item can be amber and moving normally through an agent.

clock 5h 53m against a commitment of 4h 57m · 119% of the time used
materiality medium · blast radius 14 records or people downstream
state evidence-posted — held separately, and deliberately not part of this reading

Past SLA by 56m · 14 people or records downstream of this decision